Walton v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 27, 2005
Docket05-6822
StatusUnpublished

This text of Walton v. United States (Walton v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walton v. United States, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6822

ERIC ARTHUR WALTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CA-03-207-1-IMK)

Submitted: October 20, 2005 Decided: October 27, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Arthur Walton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Eric Arthur Walton appeals the district court’s orders

denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Walton v. United States, No. CA-03-207-1-

IMK (N.D.W. Va. May 6, 2005; May 17, 2005). We deny Walton’s

motions for judicial notice and dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Walton v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-v-united-states-ca4-2005.