Walton v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Walton v. United States

146 F. App'x 694

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 27, 2005·No. No. 05-6822·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Eric Arthur Walton appeals the district court’s orders denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Walton v. United States, No. CA-03-207-1-IMK (N.D.W. Va. May 6, 2005; May 17, 2005). We deny Walton’s motions for judicial notice and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Eric Arthur Walton appeals the district court’s orders denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Walton v. United States, No. CA-03-207-1-IMK (N.D.W. Va. May 6, 2005; May 17, 2005). We deny Walton’s motions for judicial notice and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Walton v. United States, 146 F. App'x 694 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

146 F. App'x 694 (Walton v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.