Walton v. Underwood
This text of 52 F.3d 323 (Walton v. Underwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
52 F.3d 323
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Timothy Dexter WALTON, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
H.D. UNDERWOOD; P.A. Terrangi; C. Gibbs; Edward Murray;
Stephen Rosenthal; K. Epps; V. Appelwhite; E. Turner; W.
Copeland; D. Coles; R. Altman; R.K. Bynum; P. Harrison;
C. Blunt; W. Dugger; F. Wilson; W. Graves; C. Burgess;
T. Harrison; R. Tillery; E. Shands, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-6251.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 15, 1995
Decided: April 18, 1995
Timothy Dexter Walton, Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Dexter Walton, a Virginia prisoner, appeals the district court's denial of his motion for recusal and dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) action for failure to pay the assessed filing fee. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. Walton v. Underwood, No. CA-94-1213-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F.3d 323, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17361, 1995 WL 227289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-v-underwood-ca4-1995.