Walton v. Toney

Eighth Circuit

Walton v. Toney

56 F. App'x 757

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMarch 11, 2003

DocketNo. 02-3566

StatusPublished

This text of 56 F. App'x 757 (Walton v. Toney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walton v. Toney, 56 F. App'x 757 (8th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Walter Walton appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons explained by the district court: Walton’s due process claim is barred by Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Walton’s pending motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Walter Walton appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons explained by the district court: Walton’s due process claim is barred by Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Walton’s pending motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F. App'x 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-v-toney-ca8-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack