Walton v. State
This text of 249 S.W.3d 277 (Walton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Dexter Walton, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance by misinforming him regarding whether he would *278 have been entitled to certain jury instructions if he went to trial.
The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 S.W.3d 277, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 487, 2008 WL 926659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-v-state-moctapp-2008.