Walton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Walton v. State

113 S.E. 49, 29 Ga. App. 45, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 37

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 Ga. App. 158 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 25, 1922·No. 13696·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The excerpt from the charge of the court, complained of in the amendment to the motion for a new trial, when considered in connection with the entire charge, was not error.

2. The evidence, while weak, authorized the jury to find that the defendant made an assault upon the female in question with the intent then and there to have carnal knowledge of her forcibly and against her will, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodioorth, JJ., concur. Graham & Cornwell, for plaintiff in error. Alonzo M. Brand, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The excerpt from the charge of the court, complained of in the amendment to the motion for a new trial, when considered in connection with the entire charge, was not error.

2. The evidence, while weak, authorized the jury to find that the defendant made an assault upon the female in question with the intent then and there to have carnal knowledge of her forcibly and against her will, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodioorth, JJ., concur. Graham & Cornwell, for plaintiff in error. Alonzo M. Brand, solicitor-general, contra.

Walton v. State, 113 S.E. 49, 29 Ga. App. 45, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 37 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

113 S.E. 49 (Walton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.