Walton v. State

113 S.E. 49, 29 Ga. App. 45, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 37
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 25, 1922
Docket13696
StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 49 (Walton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walton v. State, 113 S.E. 49, 29 Ga. App. 45, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 37 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The excerpt from the charge of the court, complained of in the amendment to the motion for a new trial, when considered in connection with the entire charge, was not error.

2. The evidence, while weak, authorized the jury to find that the defendant made an assault upon the female in question with the intent then and there to have carnal knowledge of her forcibly and against her will, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodioorth, JJ., concur. Graham & Cornwell, for plaintiff in error. Alonzo M. Brand, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 49, 29 Ga. App. 45, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-v-state-gactapp-1922.