Walton v. State

932 So. 2d 310, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 520, 2006 WL 141523
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 20, 2006
DocketNo. 2D05-3383
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 932 So. 2d 310 (Walton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walton v. State, 932 So. 2d 310, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 520, 2006 WL 141523 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Walton may have to file a timely, facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Such a motion will not be deemed successive.

STRINGER, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

FEDERATED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Copeland
932 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
932 So. 2d 310, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 520, 2006 WL 141523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.