Walton v. State

932 So. 2d 310, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 520, 2006 WL 141523
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 2006·No. No. 2D05-3383·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Walton may have to file a timely, facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Such a motion will not be deemed successive.

STRINGER, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walton v. State, 932 So. 2d 310, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 520, 2006 WL 141523 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

932 So. 2d 310 (Walton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

FEDERATED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Copeland
932 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)