Walton v. State
This text of 687 So. 2d 364 (Walton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Peter Walton, the defendant, appeals his conviction and sentence for first degree murder and armed robbery. We affirm the conviction, however we reverse and remand for resentencing. As correctly asserted by the defendant, the trial court erred in ordering the minimum mandatory sentence imposed for the armed robbery charge to run consecutive to the minimum mandatory sentence imposed on the murder charge. See Boler v. State, 678 So.2d 319 (Fla.1996).
Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
687 So. 2d 364, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 965, 1997 WL 55692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.