Walton v. State
This text of 564 So. 2d 1162 (Walton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Ernest Walton, seeks review of his aggravated battery conviction, arguing that he was deprived of his constitutional right to cross-examine a state witness, and that the trial court improperly denied his request to proffer certain testimony during cross-examination of the same witness. After reviewing the record and the arguments, we conclude that any error on the part of the trial court in regard to these issues was harmless. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
564 So. 2d 1162, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5097, 1990 WL 98457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.