Walton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Walton v. State

564 So. 2d 1162, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5097, 1990 WL 98457

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 10, 1990·No. No. 89-1810·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ernest Walton, seeks review of his aggravated battery conviction, arguing that he was deprived of his constitutional right to cross-examine a state witness, and that the trial court improperly denied his request to proffer certain testimony during cross-examination of the same witness. After reviewing the record and the arguments, we conclude that any error on the part of the trial court in regard to these issues was harmless. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, WENTWORTH and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ernest Walton, seeks review of his aggravated battery conviction, arguing that he was deprived of his constitutional right to cross-examine a state witness, and that the trial court improperly denied his request to proffer certain testimony during cross-examination of the same witness. After reviewing the record and the arguments, we conclude that any error on the part of the trial court in regard to these issues was harmless. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, WENTWORTH and MINER, JJ., concur.

Walton v. State, 564 So. 2d 1162, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5097, 1990 WL 98457 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

564 So. 2d 1162 (Walton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related