Walton v. Riddick

605 F. App'x 191
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 2, 2015
DocketNo. 15-6136
StatusPublished

This text of 605 F. App'x 191 (Walton v. Riddick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walton v. Riddick, 605 F. App'x 191 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

■ PER CURIAM:

Brian L. Walton, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Walton’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Walton has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
605 F. App'x 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-v-riddick-ca4-2015.