Walton v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Walton v. People

68 P.3d 472, 2003 WL 1960576

Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided April 28, 2003·No. No. 02SC60·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Justice Kourlis, Justice Rice and Justice Coats are of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be affirmed, whereas Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Hobbs and Justice Martinez are of the opinion that it should be reversed.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by operation of law. CAR. $5(e).

Justice BENDER, does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Justice Kourlis, Justice Rice and Justice Coats are of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be affirmed, whereas Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Hobbs and Justice Martinez are of the opinion that it should be reversed.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by operation of law. CAR. $5(e).

Justice BENDER, does not participate.

Walton v. People, 68 P.3d 472, 2003 WL 1960576 (Colo. 2003).

Pincite

68 P.3d 472 (Walton v. People) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related