Walton v. McNeil

29 F. Cas. 141, 3 Mass. 25
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts·Decided June 15, 1794·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

[141]*141This was a declaration upon promises made at Quebec, viz. at Boston. The defendant pleaded to the jurisdiction; that the parties were both inhabitants of Quebec; and that the cause of action, if any, accrued in Canada, and not within the United States; and that cognizance thereof belonged to the courts of Great Britain, and not to any of the courts of the Uuited States. To this plea there was a demurrer and joinder. The judgment was that the plea in bar is good, and that the court will take no further cognizance of this suit, and that the defendant recover his costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walton v. McNeil, 29 F. Cas. 141, 3 Mass. 25 (circtdma 1794).

29 F. Cas. 141 (Walton v. McNeil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC
671 F.3d 736 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Badger v. Towle
48 Me. 20 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1860)
Campbell v. Wilson
6 Tex. 379 (Texas Supreme Court, 1851)
Barrell v. Benjamin
15 Mass. 354 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1819)