Walton v. McKinney

100 P. 471, 12 Ariz. 207, 1909 Ariz. LEXIS 84
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided March 20, 1909·No. Civil No. 1030·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM. —

For the reasons given in the majority opinion upon the former hearing of this case (11 Ariz. 385, 94 Pac. 1122), the judgment of the district court is reversed, with direction to that court to render judgment that the ap-pellee, P. J. McKinney, within thirty days after the rendition of such judgment, do duly execute, acknowledge, and deliver to the appellant, William Walton, his deed to the premises and property described in the complaint, but without covenants of warranty, on the payment by the said Walton [208] to the said McKinney of the sum of $5,500, with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from May 1, 1906, to the date of such judgment, and that, in case said Walton should refuse, neglect, or decline to make such payment within such period, the appellee, McKinney, have possession of said premises, and that the appellant recover of the appellee his costs expended by him in this court, as well as in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walton v. McKinney, 100 P. 471, 12 Ariz. 207, 1909 Ariz. LEXIS 84 (Ark. 1909).

100 P. 471 (Walton v. McKinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nelson v. Cannon
616 P.2d 56 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1980)