Home/Court of Appeals of North Carolina/Walton v. Lloyd

Walton v. Lloyd

215 S.E.2d 178, 26 N.C. App. 200, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2007
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedJune 4, 1975
DocketNo. 7510DC219
StatusPublished

This text of 215 S.E.2d 178 (Walton v. Lloyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walton v. Lloyd, 215 S.E.2d 178, 26 N.C. App. 200, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2007 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

ARNOLD, Judge.

In the record on appeal, deféndant has attempted to group seven assignments of error based on his exception to the judgment. The question before us therefore is whether error of law [201]*201appears on the face of the record proper. See Clark v. Richardson, 24 N.C. App. 556, 211 S.E. 2d 530 (1975) ; Moore v. Strickland, 23 N.C. App. 732, 209. S.E. 2d 830 (1974). The trial court’s findings of fact support the judgment. No error appears on the face of the record. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Judges Martin and Clark concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Strickland
209 S.E.2d 830 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
Clark v. Richardson
211 S.E.2d 530 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 S.E.2d 178, 26 N.C. App. 200, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-v-lloyd-ncctapp-1975.