Walton v. Lloyd
215 S.E.2d 178, 26 N.C. App. 200, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2007
Opinion
In the record on appeal, deféndant has attempted to group seven assignments of error based on his exception to the judgment. The question before us therefore is whether error of law [201]*201appears on the face of the record proper. See Clark v. Richardson, 24 N.C. App. 556, 211 S.E. 2d 530 (1975) ; Moore v. Strickland, 23 N.C. App. 732, 209. S.E. 2d 830 (1974). The trial court’s findings of fact support the judgment. No error appears on the face of the record. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walton v. Lloyd, 215 S.E.2d 178, 26 N.C. App. 200, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2007 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).
215 S.E.2d 178 (Walton v. Lloyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. Strickland
209 S.E.2d 830 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
Clark v. Richardson
211 S.E.2d 530 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)