Walton v. Judge, Wyandot Cty. Common Pleas Court

64 Ohio St. 3d 564
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 2, 1992·No. No. 90-2246·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On appeal, appellant cites no Ohio legal authority that permits a private citizen to present evidence before the grand jury or requires appellees to permit him to do so. Under R.C. 2939.10, only the prosecuting attorney, assistant prosecuting attorney, and, in certain cases, the Attorney General or special prosecutor appointed by the Attorney General have access to the grand jury. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walton v. Judge, Wyandot Cty. Common Pleas Court, 64 Ohio St. 3d 564 (Ohio 1992).

64 Ohio St. 3d 564 (Walton v. Judge, Wyandot Cty. Common Pleas Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Westfall v. Plummer, 07-Ca-19 (5-27-2008)
2008 Ohio 2549 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
In Re the Grand Jury Appearance Request by Loigman
870 A.2d 249 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2005)
State v. Wantz, Unpublished Decision (12-31-2003)
2003 Ohio 7203 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003)