Walton v. Guidant Sales Corp.

203 F. App'x 510
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 17, 2006
Docket06-1351
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 F. App'x 510 (Walton v. Guidant Sales Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walton v. Guidant Sales Corp., 203 F. App'x 510 (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Anthony T. Walton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims of employment discrimination for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Walton v. Guidant Sales Corp., 417 F.Supp.2d 719 (D.Md.2006). We deny Walton’s motion for admission of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 F. App'x 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-v-guidant-sales-corp-ca4-2006.