Walton v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Walton v. Employment Division

659 P.2d 1021, 62 Or. App. 190, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2487

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 9, 1983

Docket82-AB-1320; CA A25656

StatusPublished

This text of 659 P.2d 1021 (Walton v. Employment Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walton v. Employment Division, 659 P.2d 1021, 62 Or. App. 190, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2487 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case, as in Paillette v. Employment Division, 59 Or App 598, 651 P2d 1087 (1982), we are unable to discern whether the decision of the Employment Appeals Board resulted from the Board’s appropriate exercise of its authority to review findings of its hearings officer de novo.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with Paillette v. Employment Division, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case, as in Paillette v. Employment Division, 59 Or App 598, 651 P2d 1087 (1982), we are unable to discern whether the decision of the Employment Appeals Board resulted from the Board’s appropriate exercise of its authority to review findings of its hearings officer de novo.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with Paillette v. Employment Division, supra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

659 P.2d 1021, 62 Or. App. 190, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-v-employment-division-orctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack