Walton v. Doyle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Walton v. Doyle

10 A.D.2d 568, 195 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12028

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 568 (Walton v. Doyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walton v. Doyle, 10 A.D.2d 568, 195 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12028 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts and the complaint dismissed, with costs. The plaintiff has failed to establish a cause of action. Under the circumstances, the consequences of the alleged acts of the driver were not reasonably foreseeable. Lacking this essential element of actionable negligence, the judgment will not be permitted to stand. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts and the complaint dismissed, with costs. The plaintiff has failed to establish a cause of action. Under the circumstances, the consequences of the alleged acts of the driver were not reasonably foreseeable. Lacking this essential element of actionable negligence, the judgment will not be permitted to stand. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 568, 195 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-v-doyle-nyappdiv-1960.