Walton v. Crawford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Walton v. Crawford

277 S.W.3d 341, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 161, 2009 WL 364119

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 17, 2009·No. WD 68661·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

James Walton brings a pro se appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections on his petition for declaratory judgment. After a thorough review of the record and viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, we find that the Director made a prima facie showing that summary judgment was proper and Walton failed to show that there was a genuine issue of material fact. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

James Walton brings a pro se appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections on his petition for declaratory judgment. After a thorough review of the record and viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, we find that the Director made a prima facie showing that summary judgment was proper and Walton failed to show that there was a genuine issue of material fact. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Walton v. Crawford, 277 S.W.3d 341, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 161, 2009 WL 364119 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

277 S.W.3d 341 (Walton v. Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related