Walton, Sharon Nicole

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 16, 2020
DocketWR-91,668-01
StatusPublished

This text of Walton, Sharon Nicole (Walton, Sharon Nicole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walton, Sharon Nicole, (Tex. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,668-01

EX PARTE SHARON NICOLE WALTON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 29857-A IN THE 349TH DISTRICT COURT FROM ANDERSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Applicant originally entered an open plea of guilty to engaging in organized criminal activity

and received a sentence of ten years’ community supervision. Her community supervision was later

revoked, and she was sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. She filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See

TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC . art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that she was denied her right to an appeal through no fault of her own.

The record indicates that Applicant wrote to the trial court indicating a desire to appeal after

revocation, but that the letter, which was mailed from prison, did not reach the trial court until several

days after the deadline for filing notice of appeal. The trial court appointed appellate counsel, who 2

immediately filed a notice of appeal. Appellate counsel also timely filed a motion for extension of

time for filing notice of appeal, but filed it in the trial court rather than the court of appeals, as

required by Rule 26.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The court of appeals dismissed

the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Walton v. State, No. 12-20-00010-CR (Tex. App. — Tyler

January 31, 2020) (not designated for publication).

Based on the record, it appears that Applicant was denied the opportunity to appeal due to

a breakdown in the system. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Relief is

granted. Applicant may file an out-of-time appeal of her revocation and sentence in cause number

29857 from the 349th District Court of Anderson County. Within ten days from the date of this

Court’s mandate, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent

and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent her on direct

appeal. All deadlines shall be calculated as if Applicant was sentenced on the date of this Court’s

mandate. Should Applicant decide to appeal, she must file a written notice of appeal in the trial court

within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: September 16, 2020

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Riley
193 S.W.3d 900 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Walton, Sharon Nicole, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-sharon-nicole-texcrimapp-2020.