Waltman v. Time Warner Inc.
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 571 (Waltman v. Time Warner Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeals from orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered May 21, 2015 and October 2, 2015, which granted defendants’ respective motion to dismiss the complaint and enjoined the individual plaintiff from initiating any further litigation on any claim against defendants without prior approval of the Administrative Judge of the court in which plaintiff seeks to bring further litigation, deemed to be appeals from the subsequent judgments (CPLR 5501 [c]), same court and Justice, entered February 10, 2016, and August 18, 2016 dismissing the complaint, and as so considered, said judgments unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs’ complaint is barred under res judicata, since a judgment on the merits exists from a prior action between the same parties involving the same subject matter (Matter of Hunter, 4 NY3d 260, 269 [2005]).
The motion court properly enjoined the individual plaintiff to the extent indicated (Matter of Sud v Sud, 227 AD2d 319, 319 [1st Dept 1996]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 571, 146 A.D.3d 699, 44 N.Y.S.3d 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waltman-v-time-warner-inc-nyappdiv-2017.