WALTHOUR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
This text of WALTHOUR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA (WALTHOUR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
VICTOR WALTHOUR : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-2779 : CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL. :
ORDER
This 13th day of August, 2021, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (ECF 11, 12, 14) are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff is FURTHER ORDERED, within fourteen (14) days, to show cause as to why his complaint against the City of Philadelphia should not be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6). See Schneller ex rel Schneller v. Fox Subacute at Clara Burke, 317 Fed.Appx. 135, 138 (3d Cir. 2008) (observing that while district courts are empowered to dismiss complaints sua sponte, plaintiffs “must be given notice and an opportunity to respond”).
/s/ Gerald Austin McHugh United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
WALTHOUR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walthour-v-city-of-philadelphia-paed-2021.