Walthol v. Johnson
This text of 6 Va. 232 (Walthol v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was nothing improper in submiting the evidence to the jury: But it might have been otherwise, if it had been gaming, usury or any other thing of that nature, which was to have been proved.
Judgment affirmed.
[* See Vaughn's adm'r. v. Winckler's ex'r. 4 Munf. 136; Lewis v. Long, 3 Munf. 136; Canty v. Sumter, 2 Bay, 93; Frear v. Evertson, 20 Johns. R. 142; and Carr, J. in Ben et al. v. Peete, 2 Rand./ 547-549.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Va. 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walthol-v-johnson-vactapp-1800.