Waltham v. Carson
This text of 10 Cal. 178 (Waltham v. Carson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Terry, C. J., and Burnett, J., concurring.
The plaintiff had judgment, and the defendant appealed, and assigns as error; first, that the findings of the Court are unsupported by the evidence j and, second, that the cause was tried without a jury. The first assignment is abandoned in the brief of appellant; and the second assignment is answered by the fact that a jury was waived by the failure of the defendant to appear at the trial. (Practice Act, § 179.)
Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent, damages on the assessed value of the property.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Cal. 178, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waltham-v-carson-cal-1858.