Walters v. Western & A. R.

Fifth Circuit

Walters v. Western & A. R.

74 F. 656, 21 C.C.A. 45, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1970

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 5, 1896

DocketNo. 457

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F. 656 (Walters v. Western & A. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walters v. Western & A. R., 74 F. 656, 21 C.C.A. 45, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1970 (5th Cir. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judge of the circuit court gave elaborate reasons for his decree. Without affirming his reasons in toto, we are satisfied that the decree appealed from is correct, on the ground that, at the date of the garnishment of the Western & Atlantic Railroad Company on the judgment against Perino Brown, the said railroad company is not. shown to have been indebted to said Brown beyond -the sum of $80, which sum, by the decree, is awarded to the intervener. Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judge of the circuit court gave elaborate reasons for his decree. Without affirming his reasons in toto, we are satisfied that the decree appealed from is correct, on the ground that, at the date of the garnishment of the Western & Atlantic Railroad Company on the judgment against Perino Brown, the said railroad company is not. shown to have been indebted to said Brown beyond -the sum of $80, which sum, by the decree, is awarded to the intervener. Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F. 656, 21 C.C.A. 45, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-western-a-r-ca5-1896.