Walters v. Utendorfer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Walters v. Utendorfer

208 N.W. 800, 190 Wis. 188, 1926 Wisc. LEXIS 160

Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided May 11, 1926·Published

Opinion

Doerfler, J.

Upon a hearing of the appeal in this court, Justice E. Ray Stevens, having presided in the trial of thé case in the circuit court, was disqualified from participating on the hearing in this court. Justices Rosenberry, Crown-hart, and the writer voted for affirmance, while Chief Justice Vinje and Justices Owen and Eschweiler voted for a reversal. Under the rule, the judgment of the circuit court, therefore, is affirmed without opinion.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doerfler, J.

Upon a hearing of the appeal in this court, Justice E. Ray Stevens, having presided in the trial of thé case in the circuit court, was disqualified from participating on the hearing in this court. Justices Rosenberry, Crown-hart, and the writer voted for affirmance, while Chief Justice Vinje and Justices Owen and Eschweiler voted for a reversal. Under the rule, the judgment of the circuit court, therefore, is affirmed without opinion.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Walters v. Utendorfer, 208 N.W. 800, 190 Wis. 188, 1926 Wisc. LEXIS 160 (Wis. 1926).

Pincite

208 N.W. 800 (Walters v. Utendorfer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.