Walters v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Walters v. State

667 S.W.2d 959, 282 Ark. 392, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1656

DecidedMay 7, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 667 S.W.2d 959 (Walters v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walters v. State, 667 S.W.2d 959, 282 Ark. 392, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1656 (Ark. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner James C. Walters, by his attorney, has filed a second motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Dale Varner, has by affidavit admitted it was his fault that the record was not timely tendered.

We find that the error, admittedly made by the criminal defendant’s attorney, is good cause to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Petitioner James C. Walters, by his attorney, has filed a second motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Dale Varner, has by affidavit admitted it was his fault that the record was not timely tendered.

We find that the error, admittedly made by the criminal defendant’s attorney, is good cause to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 S.W.2d 959, 282 Ark. 392, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-state-ark-1984.