Walters v. Shearer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Walters v. Shearer

82 N.E. 1135, 40 Ind. App. 528, 1907 Ind. App. LEXIS 94

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 20, 1907

DocketNo. 5,917

StatusPublished

This text of 82 N.E. 1135 (Walters v. Shearer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walters v. Shearer, 82 N.E. 1135, 40 Ind. App. 528, 1907 Ind. App. LEXIS 94 (Ind. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an action by appellant against appellees for ejectment. Appellees answered setting up liens, and filed a cross-complaint for the foreclosure of a bond for a deed, to quiet title, and for other proper relief. There was a trial by court, and finding for appellant that he have possession, and finding for appellee Shearer that he have judgment for balance of purchase money and money expended upon the property, and to discharge liens thereon, said judgments being declared liens on the real estate in question. We-have carefully examined the record, including the evidence offered. The finding and judgment of the court are clearly in accord therewith and the equities of the parties thereto. We find no reversible error in the record.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was an action by appellant against appellees for ejectment. Appellees answered setting up liens, and filed a cross-complaint for the foreclosure of a bond for a deed, to quiet title, and for other proper relief. There was a trial by court, and finding for appellant that he have possession, and finding for appellee Shearer that he have judgment for balance of purchase money and money expended upon the property, and to discharge liens thereon, said judgments being declared liens on the real estate in question. We-have carefully examined the record, including the evidence offered. The finding and judgment of the court are clearly in accord therewith and the equities of the parties thereto. We find no reversible error in the record.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 N.E. 1135, 40 Ind. App. 528, 1907 Ind. App. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-shearer-indctapp-1907.