Walters v. Phœnix Utility Co.
Opinion
The order of the judge affirming the order of the clerk, and denying the motion of the nonresident defendants for the removal of this action from the State Court to the Federal Court for trial, upon the grounds stated in the petition, is affirmed upon the authority of Givens v. Mfg. Co., ante, 377; Crisp v. Fibre Co., 193 N. C., 77, 136 S. E., 238; Fenner v. Cedar Works, 191 N. C., 207, 131 S. E., 625. The principles controlling the decision of the question presented by this appeal are well settled in the above-cited cases. It is unnecessary to cite other cases in this or other jurisdictions; nor is it deemed necessary to restate these principles. There is no error, and the order is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
145 S.E. 927 (Walters v. Phœnix Utility Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.