Walters v. Phœnix Utility Co.

145 S.E. 927, 196 N.C. 817, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 424
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 19, 1928
StatusPublished

This text of 145 S.E. 927 (Walters v. Phœnix Utility Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walters v. Phœnix Utility Co., 145 S.E. 927, 196 N.C. 817, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 424 (N.C. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order of the judge affirming the order of the clerk, and denying the motion of the nonresident defendants for the removal of this action from the State Court to the Federal Court for trial, upon the grounds stated in the petition, is affirmed upon the authority of Givens v. Mfg. Co., ante, 377; Crisp v. Fibre Co., 193 N. C., 77, 136 S. E., 238; Fenner v. Cedar Works, 191 N. C., 207, 131 S. E., 625. The principles controlling the decision of the question presented by this appeal are well settled in the above-cited cases. It is unnecessary to cite other cases in this or other jurisdictions; nor is it deemed necessary to restate these principles. There is no error, and the order is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crisp v. Champion Fibre Co.
136 S.E. 238 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Fenner v. Richmond Cedar Works
131 S.E. 625 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 S.E. 927, 196 N.C. 817, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-phnix-utility-co-nc-1928.