Walters v. Phila. Traction Co.
28 A. 941, 161 Pa. 36, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 627
Opinion
Plaintiff’s right to recover depended on questions of fact which were clearly for the consideration of the jury. These questions were properly submitted to them with instructions which appear to be adequate and free from any error of which defendant has any just reason to complain. The only subject of complaint is that part of the charge recited in the specifications of error. There is nothing in either of these excerpts that would justify a reversal of the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walters v. Phila. Traction Co., 28 A. 941, 161 Pa. 36, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 627 (Pa. 1894).
28 A. 941 (Walters v. Phila. Traction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Daniel v. Pennsylvania R.
72 F. Supp. 15 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1946)
Hunterson v. Union Traction Co.
55 A. 543 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)
Powelson v. United Traction Co.
54 A. 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)
Austrian v. United Traction Co.
19 Pa. Super. 329 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)