Walters v. Nakamura
This text of Walters v. Nakamura (Walters v. Nakamura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-15-0000672 28-OCT-2015 09:00 AM
SCPW-15-0000672
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
CARRIE J. WALTERS, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE GREG K. NAKAMURA, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent Judge,
and
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (S.P.P. NO. 13-1-0002)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Carrie Walters’s
petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on September 16, 2015, the
documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and
the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that
she is entitled to the requested writ of mandamus. See Kema v.
Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a
writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue
unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right
to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately
the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 28, 2015.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Walters v. Nakamura, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-nakamura-haw-2015.