Walters v. Kraemer
This text of 17 N.Y.S. 659 (Walters v. Kraemer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff had a right to attach whatever interest the defendant had in the property levied on under the attachment. It is immaterial whether it was proper for plaintiff to file a notice of pendency of action, and index it against Fredericka Kraemer upon this motion, as she has no standing in court sufficient to enable her to bring this appeal. She is neither a party to the suit, nor, so far as appears, has any interest in the subject-matter of the action, nor is she aggrieved by the order appealed from. Watson v. Nelson, 69 N. Y. 539; Code, § 1294; Bank v. Risley, 19 N. Y. 375; Bergen v. Carman, 79 N. Y. 146. Order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 N.Y.S. 659, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 4, 63 Hun 628, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-kraemer-nysupct-1892.