Walters v. Freeman
This text of 42 S.E. 741 (Walters v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While the case for plaintiff in error appeals more strongly to this court than that for the defendant in error, yet as a jury of the vicinage has seen proper to render a verdict for the defendant in error, in a case turning upon questions of fact, the judge who presided in the case has approved the verT diet, and the motion for a new trial is confined to the general grounds, this court, in accordance with the rule of non-interference in such cases, feels constrained to affirm the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 S.E. 741, 116 Ga. 423, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-freeman-ga-1902.