Walters v. Fredericks

11 Iowa 181
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedOctober 12, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 Iowa 181 (Walters v. Fredericks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walters v. Fredericks, 11 Iowa 181 (iowa 1860).

Opinion

Lowe C. J.

This was a proceeding by injunction to abate an alledged nuisance. Defendant appears, demurs to the equity of the bill, also answers; and after filing his answer, moved the court to dissolve the injunction, which the court not only properly sustained, as we think, but also upon the same motion dismissed the suit at the cost of plaintiff. This last order of the court is assigned for error, [182]*182and is well taken. The motion did not ask for the dismissal of the suit, but simply that the injunction be dissolved. The record does not show that there was any hearing upon the demurrer, or upon the case itself as made by the bill and answer. The injunction being dissolved, the case should have been retained for hearing upon the issues made before the court, so as to afford the plaintiff a day in court upon his complaint.

The order dissmissing the suit is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sioux City Night Patrol v. Mathwig
277 N.W. 457 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1938)
Russell v. Wilson & Co.
37 Iowa 377 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Iowa 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-fredericks-iowa-1860.