Walters v. Eakins

179 N.W. 781, 172 Wis. 626, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 264
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 16, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 179 N.W. 781 (Walters v. Eakins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walters v. Eakins, 179 N.W. 781, 172 Wis. 626, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 264 (Wis. 1920).

Opinion

Rosenberry, J.

Although the question is not raised in briefs of counsel, we cannot take jurisdiction of this matter unless the order appealed from is in fact an appeal-able order. We find no provision of the statutes, sec. 3069, [627]*627authorizing an appeal from an order setting aside a stipulation. The order does not prevent a judgment from which an- appeal may be taken, neither is it a final order. It does not grant or refuse a provisional remedy, nor does it vacate or refuse to set aside an order made at chambers, nor does it grant a new trial. Inasmuch as there must be a new trial, we refrain from any statement or discussion of the facts.

By the Court. — The appeal to this court is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Will of Pattison
207 N.W. 292 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1926)
Southern Colonization Co. v. Howard Cole & Co.
201 N.W. 817 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 N.W. 781, 172 Wis. 626, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-eakins-wis-1920.