Walters v. Eakins

179 N.W. 781, 172 Wis. 626, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 264
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided November 16, 1920·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Rosenberry, J.

Although the question is not raised in briefs of counsel, we cannot take jurisdiction of this matter unless the order appealed from is in fact an appeal-able order. We find no provision of the statutes, sec. 3069, [627]*627authorizing an appeal from an order setting aside a stipulation. The order does not prevent a judgment from which an- appeal may be taken, neither is it a final order. It does not grant or refuse a provisional remedy, nor does it vacate or refuse to set aside an order made at chambers, nor does it grant a new trial. Inasmuch as there must be a new trial, we refrain from any statement or discussion of the facts.

By the Court. — The appeal to this court is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walters v. Eakins, 179 N.W. 781, 172 Wis. 626, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 264 (Wis. 1920).

179 N.W. 781 (Walters v. Eakins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Will of Pattison
207 N.W. 292 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1926)
Southern Colonization Co. v. Howard Cole & Co.
201 N.W. 817 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1925)