Walters v. DSCYF

Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided January 28, 2020·No. 244, 2019·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FRANCINE WALTERS,1 § § No. 244, 2019 Petitioner Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Family Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § File No. CN18-02331 DEPARTMENT OF SERVICES FOR § Petition No. 18-37066 CHILDREN, YOUTH AND THEIR § FAMILIES, § §

Respondent Below, § Appellee. § §

IN THE INTEREST OF: § JAYDEN WILLIAMS §

Submitted: December 6, 2019 Decided: January 28, 2020

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VAUGHN, and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we

conclude that the judgment of the Family Court should be affirmed on the basis of

and for the reasons stated in its May 22, 2019 Decision and Order.

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the appellants under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walters v. DSCYF, (Del. 2020).

Walters v. DSCYF (Walters v. DSCYF) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.