Walters v. Cooper

142 P. 359, 71 Or. 139, 1914 Ore. LEXIS 163
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided June 9, 1914·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is settled by the case of Page v. Ford, 65 Or. 450 (131 Pac. 1013, 45 L. R. A. (N. S.) 247), that a creditor holding a purchase-money mortgage may waive his security and recover upon the promissory note accompanying it. This right cannot be divested by an independent agreement between the debtor and a third person that such person will assume and pay the mortgage. The remedy of the original debtor under such circumstances is to sue his assignee for breach of the agreement, or in a proper case to ask to be subrogated to the rights of the original creditor in the mortgage.

The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walters v. Cooper, 142 P. 359, 71 Or. 139, 1914 Ore. LEXIS 163 (Or. 1914).

142 P. 359 (Walters v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lutz v. Blackwell Et Ux.
273 P. 705 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1928)
Wright v. Wimberly
156 P. 257 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1916)