Walters v. Cooper

142 P. 359, 71 Or. 139, 1914 Ore. LEXIS 163
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedJune 9, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 142 P. 359 (Walters v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walters v. Cooper, 142 P. 359, 71 Or. 139, 1914 Ore. LEXIS 163 (Or. 1914).

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is settled by the case of Page v. Ford, 65 Or. 450 (131 Pac. 1013, 45 L. R. A. (N. S.) 247), that a creditor holding a purchase-money mortgage may waive his security and recover upon the promissory note accompanying it. This right cannot be divested by an independent agreement between the debtor and a third person that such person will assume and pay the mortgage. The remedy of the original debtor under such circumstances is to sue his assignee for breach of the agreement, or in a proper case to ask to be subrogated to the rights of the original creditor in the mortgage.

The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lutz v. Blackwell Et Ux.
273 P. 705 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1928)
Wright v. Wimberly
156 P. 257 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 P. 359, 71 Or. 139, 1914 Ore. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-cooper-or-1914.