Walters v. CLAY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Walters v. CLAY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.

8 So. 3d 376, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1359, 2009 WL 383602

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 17, 2009

Docket1D08-4418

StatusPublished

This text of 8 So. 3d 376 (Walters v. CLAY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walters v. CLAY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., 8 So. 3d 376, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1359, 2009 WL 383602 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (JCC) award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $3,815, arguing that the JCC erred in rejecting the parties’ stipulation to an attorney’s fee of $5,000. The Employer/Carrier (E/C) concedes error. Because Claimant did not raise his argument before the JCC, however, this issue was not preserved for review and will not be addressed by this court. See Jellison v. Dixie S. Indus., Inc., 857 So.2d 365, 366 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Hamilton v. R.L. Best Int’l, 996 So.2d 233 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). We reject the E/C’s concession of error. The JCC’s order is AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (JCC) award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $3,815, arguing that the JCC erred in rejecting the parties’ stipulation to an attorney’s fee of $5,000. The Employer/Carrier (E/C) concedes error. Because Claimant did not raise his argument before the JCC, however, this issue was not preserved for review and will not be addressed by this court. See Jellison v. Dixie S. Indus., Inc., 857 So.2d 365, 366 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Hamilton v. R.L. Best Int’l, 996 So.2d 233 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). We reject the E/C’s concession of error. The JCC’s order is AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 So. 3d 376, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1359, 2009 WL 383602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-clay-electric-cooperative-inc-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack