Walters v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Walters v. City of New York

38 A.D.2d 864, 330 N.Y.S.2d 258

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 864 (Walters v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walters v. City of New York, 38 A.D.2d 864, 330 N.Y.S.2d 258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 23, 1971, which denied their motion for a general preference. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted. In our opinion, under the circumstances of this ease, considering the nature and extent of the injuries claimed to have resulted from the accident, “the disability was sufficient to warrant a possible evaluation in excess of the jurisdiction of the Civil Court of the City of New York and a general preference should have been granted ” (Phillips v. Beechcraft Apts., Section No. 1 Corp., 36 A D 2d 729). [865]*865Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Gulotta, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 23, 1971, which denied their motion for a general preference. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted. In our opinion, under the circumstances of this ease, considering the nature and extent of the injuries claimed to have resulted from the accident, “the disability was sufficient to warrant a possible evaluation in excess of the jurisdiction of the Civil Court of the City of New York and a general preference should have been granted ” (Phillips v. Beechcraft Apts., Section No. 1 Corp., 36 A D 2d 729). [865]*865Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Gulotta, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 864, 330 N.Y.S.2d 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1972.