Walters v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad

95 N.Y.S. 1165

This text of 95 N.Y.S. 1165 (Walters v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walters v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad, 95 N.Y.S. 1165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment modified, so as to grant a new trial to the defendant, upon the ground that the verdict in favor of the plaintiff was against the weight of evidence, upon payment by the defendant of the costs of the trial already had and disbursements to the date of the order, and the judgment, so far as it directs a verdict in favor of the defendant, reversed, without costs, on the authority of Dowling v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co. (decided August 31, 1905) 95 N. Y. Supp. 105.

WOODWARD, j., votes to reinstate the verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dowling v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
107 A.D. 312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 N.Y.S. 1165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-brooklyn-heights-railroad-nyappdiv-1905.