Walters v. . Breeder

48 N.C. 64
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 5, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 48 N.C. 64 (Walters v. . Breeder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walters v. . Breeder, 48 N.C. 64 (N.C. 1855).

Opinion

Pearson, J.

We think it settled, that a citizen of South Carolina may sue another citizen of that State, in the courts of our State, upon a personal cause of action originating in South’ Carolina. Miller v. Black, 2 Jones’ Rep. 341.

The distinction suggested in the argument that, in this case, both the parties are residents of the same State, can make no difference.

There is error. The plaintiff was entitled to a judgment of respondeat ouster.

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allen & O'Hara, Inc. v. Weingart
209 S.E.2d 839 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
Harris v. Harris
126 S.E.2d 83 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Ledford v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
101 S.E. 533 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)
McDonald v. MacArthur Bros.
69 S.E. 832 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
State ex rel. Mackey v. District Court
106 P. 1098 (Montana Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 N.C. 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-breeder-nc-1855.