Walters v. . Breeder
48 N.C. 64
Opinion
We think it settled, that a citizen of South Carolina may sue another citizen of that State, in the courts of our State, upon a personal cause of action originating in South’ Carolina. Miller v. Black, 2 Jones’ Rep. 341.
The distinction suggested in the argument that, in this case, both the parties are residents of the same State, can make no difference.
There is error. The plaintiff was entitled to a judgment of respondeat ouster.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walters v. . Breeder, 48 N.C. 64 (N.C. 1855).
48 N.C. 64 (Walters v. . Breeder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Allen & O'Hara, Inc. v. Weingart
209 S.E.2d 839 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
Harris v. Harris
126 S.E.2d 83 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Ledford v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
101 S.E. 533 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)
McDonald v. MacArthur Bros.
69 S.E. 832 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
State ex rel. Mackey v. District Court
106 P. 1098 (Montana Supreme Court, 1910)