Walters Julius Washington v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Walters Julius Washington v. the State of Texas

DecidedOctober 17, 2023

Docket14-23-00560-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Walters Julius Washington v. the State of Texas (Walters Julius Washington v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walters Julius Washington v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 17, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00560-CR

WALTERS JULIUS WASHINGTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 482nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1751550

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a plea of guilty for the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Appellant and the State agreed that appellant’s punishment would not exceed confinement in prison for more than eight years. In accordance with the terms of this plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for eight years. We dismiss the appeal.

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal, indicating we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). An agreement that places a cap on punishment is a plea bargain for purposes of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Waters v. State, 124 S.W.3d 825, 826–27 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref’d) (holding reviewing court lacked jurisdiction when defendant pleaded guilty with a sentencing cap of ten years, even though trial judge mistakenly certified defendant had right of appeal); Threadgill v. State, 120 S.W.3d 871, 872 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no. pet.) (holding statement in record indicating no agreed recommendation existed did not convert proceeding into an open plea in which plea was entered pursuant to agreed sentencing cap).

Because appellant’s plea was made pursuant to a plea bargain, he may appeal only matters raised by a written pre-trial motion or with the trial court’s permission. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant does not challenge any pre-trial rulings.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 17, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00560-CR

WALTERS JULIUS WASHINGTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 482nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1751550

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a plea of guilty for the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Appellant and the State agreed that appellant’s punishment would not exceed confinement in prison for more than eight years. In accordance with the terms of this plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for eight years. We dismiss the appeal.

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal, indicating we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). An agreement that places a cap on punishment is a plea bargain for purposes of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Waters v. State, 124 S.W.3d 825, 826–27 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref’d) (holding reviewing court lacked jurisdiction when defendant pleaded guilty with a sentencing cap of ten years, even though trial judge mistakenly certified defendant had right of appeal); Threadgill v. State, 120 S.W.3d 871, 872 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no. pet.) (holding statement in record indicating no agreed recommendation existed did not convert proceeding into an open plea in which plea was entered pursuant to agreed sentencing cap).

Because appellant’s plea was made pursuant to a plea bargain, he may appeal only matters raised by a written pre-trial motion or with the trial court’s permission. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant does not challenge any pre-trial rulings.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Walters Julius Washington v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-julius-washington-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack