Walter Woodson Kolomyski v. United States
351 F.2d 950
Opinion
We have carefully considered the testimony alleged to have constituted error in the context of the trial and conclude that it was not such a prejudicial error as would require reversal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walter Woodson Kolomyski v. United States, 351 F.2d 950 (5th Cir. 1965).
351 F.2d 950 (Walter Woodson Kolomyski v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.