Walter Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walter Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education. Read the opinion of the Court — 546 F. App'x 209
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2014·No. 13-2352·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2352

WALTER LEE WHITAKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NASH-ROCKY MOUNT BOARD OF EDUCATION, d/b/a Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools; ROBBIN BODDIE-HAGGINS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:12-cv-00623-BO)

Submitted: March 25, 2014 Decided: March 27, 2014

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Lee Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. Dan M. Hartzog, Jr., Donna Rhea Rascoe, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Walter Lee Whitaker appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to defendants on his claim of

retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. of Educ., No.

5:12-cv-00623-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2013). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walter Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education, (4th Cir. 2014).

Walter Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education (Walter Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.