Walter W. Krantz v. Richard W. Van Dette and Virgil P. Van Dette

272 F.2d 709, 124 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 2, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5314
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 19, 1959
Docket13801
StatusPublished

This text of 272 F.2d 709 (Walter W. Krantz v. Richard W. Van Dette and Virgil P. Van Dette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walter W. Krantz v. Richard W. Van Dette and Virgil P. Van Dette, 272 F.2d 709, 124 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 2, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5314 (6th Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a comprehensive trial in the district court, the complaint of the appellant-inventor, asking recovery against appellees of royalties under three license agreements, was dismissed. From the order of dismissal, this appeal is taken and has been heard and duly considered *710 upon the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys and upon the record in the case.

Judge Weick, the trial judge, now a member of this court, wrote an opinion carefully discussing the pertinent issues in the case; and, in our view, correctly deciding them.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court reported at 165 F.Supp. 776, the order dismissing the complaint is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Krantz v. Van Dette
165 F. Supp. 776 (N.D. Ohio, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 F.2d 709, 124 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 2, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-w-krantz-v-richard-w-van-dette-and-virgil-p-van-dette-ca6-1959.