Walter W. Krantz v. Richard W. Van Dette and Virgil P. Van Dette

272 F.2d 709, 124 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 2, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5314
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 19, 1959·No. 13801·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a comprehensive trial in the district court, the complaint of the appellant-inventor, asking recovery against appellees of royalties under three license agreements, was dismissed. From the order of dismissal, this appeal is taken and has been heard and duly considered *710 upon the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys and upon the record in the case.

Judge Weick, the trial judge, now a member of this court, wrote an opinion carefully discussing the pertinent issues in the case; and, in our view, correctly deciding them.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court reported at 165 F.Supp. 776, the order dismissing the complaint is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walter W. Krantz v. Richard W. Van Dette and Virgil P. Van Dette, 272 F.2d 709, 124 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 2, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5314 (6th Cir. 1959).

272 F.2d 709 (Walter W. Krantz v. Richard W. Van Dette and Virgil P. Van Dette) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krantz v. Van Dette
165 F. Supp. 776 (N.D. Ohio, 1958)