Walter Vidal-Arias v. VR Park at Waterford Limited Partnership D/B/A the Park at Waterford Harbor

Court of Appeals of Texas

Walter Vidal-Arias v. VR Park at Waterford Limited Partnership D/B/A the Park at Waterford Harbor

DecidedFebruary 6, 2018

Docket01-17-00282-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Walter Vidal-Arias v. VR Park at Waterford Limited Partnership D/B/A the Park at Waterford Harbor (Walter Vidal-Arias v. VR Park at Waterford Limited Partnership D/B/A the Park at Waterford Harbor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walter Vidal-Arias v. VR Park at Waterford Limited Partnership D/B/A the Park at Waterford Harbor, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Walter Vidal-Arias v. VR Park at Waterford

Appellate case number: 01-17-00282-CV

Trial court case number: CV-0072181

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Galveston County

Appellant filed his notice of appeal on March 30, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The record was due on May 1, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 35.1. The clerk’s record was filed on May 2, 2017. The reporter’s record has not been filed.

On September 28, 2017, the Clerk notified appellant that the court reporter responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed the Court that appellant had not requested preparation of the record or had not made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. The Clerk further notified appellant that unless he provided proof of payment for preparation of the reporter’s record, proof of having made payment arrangements for the reporter’s record, or a response showing that he was exempt from paying for the reporter’s record by October 30, 2017, the Court might consider and decide only those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

Appellant has not provided the Court with evidence showing that he has paid or made arrangements to pay the court reporter. Accordingly, the Court will consider and decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See id.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the filing of appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 6, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Walter Vidal-Arias v. VR Park at Waterford

Appellate case number: 01-17-00282-CV

Trial court case number: CV-0072181

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Galveston County

Appellant filed his notice of appeal on March 30, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The record was due on May 1, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 35.1. The clerk’s record was filed on May 2, 2017. The reporter’s record has not been filed.

On September 28, 2017, the Clerk notified appellant that the court reporter responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed the Court that appellant had not requested preparation of the record or had not made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. The Clerk further notified appellant that unless he provided proof of payment for preparation of the reporter’s record, proof of having made payment arrangements for the reporter’s record, or a response showing that he was exempt from paying for the reporter’s record by October 30, 2017, the Court might consider and decide only those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

Appellant has not provided the Court with evidence showing that he has paid or made arrangements to pay the court reporter. Accordingly, the Court will consider and decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See id.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the filing of appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 6, 2018

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Walter Vidal-Arias v. VR Park at Waterford Limited Partnership D/B/A the Park at Waterford Harbor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-vidal-arias-v-vr-park-at-waterford-limited-partnership-dba-the-texapp-2018.