Walter Valentine v. The South Coast Corporation

334 F.2d 244, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4666
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 20, 1964·No. 21069·Published

Opinion

334 F.2d 244

Walter VALENTINE, Appellant,
v.
The SOUTH COAST CORPORATION et al., Appellees.

No. 21069.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

July 20, 1964.

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, E. Gordon West, Judge.

Jack C. Benjamin, Kierr & Gainsburgh, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Harry McCall, Jr., Chaffe, McCall, Phillips, Burke, Toler & Hopkins, New Orleans, La., for appellee. William K. Christovich, Christovich & Kearney, New Orleans, La., for The South Coast Corp., appellee.

Before RIVES and JONES, Circuit Judges, and BOOTLE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The district court has, in our belief, fully covered and properly decided the controversy presented by this appeal. Valentine v. South Coast Corporation, D.C., 218 F.Supp. 148. Its judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walter Valentine v. The South Coast Corporation, 334 F.2d 244, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4666 (5th Cir. 1964).

334 F.2d 244 (Walter Valentine v. The South Coast Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Valentine v. South Coast Corp.
218 F. Supp. 148 (E.D. Louisiana, 1963)
Valentine v. South Coast Corp.
334 F.2d 244 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)