Walter Valentine v. The South Coast Corporation
This text of 334 F.2d 244 (Walter Valentine v. The South Coast Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Walter VALENTINE, Appellant,
v.
The SOUTH COAST CORPORATION et al., Appellees.
No. 21069.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
July 20, 1964.
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, E. Gordon West, Judge.
Jack C. Benjamin, Kierr & Gainsburgh, New Orleans, La., for appellant.
Harry McCall, Jr., Chaffe, McCall, Phillips, Burke, Toler & Hopkins, New Orleans, La., for appellee. William K. Christovich, Christovich & Kearney, New Orleans, La., for The South Coast Corp., appellee.
Before RIVES and JONES, Circuit Judges, and BOOTLE, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The district court has, in our belief, fully covered and properly decided the controversy presented by this appeal. Valentine v. South Coast Corporation, D.C., 218 F.Supp. 148. Its judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 F.2d 244, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-valentine-v-the-south-coast-corporation-ca5-1964.