Walter v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 480
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walter v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Cust. Ct. 26
United States Customs Court·Decided May 16, 1961·No. No. 65621; protests 59/31545, 59/31608, and 60/2165 (San Francisco)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al. v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 409', as modified, supra, for bamboo articles was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to be the same as the merchandise the subject of C.D. 2098, supra, except that they are made of chip, were held dutiable at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 1537, as modified, supra, for manufactures of chip, not specially provided for, by similitude under paragraph 1559, as amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walter v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 480 (cusc 1961).

46 Cust. Ct. 480 (Walter v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walter v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 26 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)