Walter v. Tabor
This text of 21 Mo. 75 (Walter v. Tabor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of an inferior court affirmed here, is a subsisting valid judgment in the court where it was originally rendered, and may be carried into execution accordingly. This is settled practice, and has been repeatedly recognized in this court, and we cannot allow it to be now drawn in question. (Meyer v. Campbell, 12 Mo. Rep. 602. Wilburn’s Adm’r v. Hall, 17 Mo. Rep. 471.)
We discover no variance between the recognizance sued upon and the one given in evidence. Let the judgment be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Mo. 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-v-tabor-mo-1855.