Walter v. Tabor
21 Mo. 75
Opinion
The judgment of an inferior court affirmed here, is a subsisting valid judgment in the court where it was originally rendered, and may be carried into execution accordingly. This is settled practice, and has been repeatedly recognized in this court, and we cannot allow it to be now drawn in question. (Meyer v. Campbell, 12 Mo. Rep. 602. Wilburn’s Adm’r v. Hall, 17 Mo. Rep. 471.)
We discover no variance between the recognizance sued upon and the one given in evidence. Let the judgment be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walter v. Tabor, 21 Mo. 75 (Mo. 1855).
21 Mo. 75 (Walter v. Tabor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Block v. Morrison
20 S.W. 340 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
International Bank v. Poppers
105 Ill. 491 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1882)
Slagel v. Murdock
65 Mo. 522 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1877)