Walter v. Tabor

21 Mo. 75
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMarch 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 21 Mo. 75 (Walter v. Tabor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walter v. Tabor, 21 Mo. 75 (Mo. 1855).

Opinion

Leonard, Judge.

The judgment of an inferior court affirmed here, is a subsisting valid judgment in the court where it was originally rendered, and may be carried into execution accordingly. This is settled practice, and has been repeatedly recognized in this court, and we cannot allow it to be now drawn in question. (Meyer v. Campbell, 12 Mo. Rep. 602. Wilburn’s Adm’r v. Hall, 17 Mo. Rep. 471.)

We discover no variance between the recognizance sued upon and the one given in evidence. Let the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Block v. Morrison
20 S.W. 340 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
International Bank v. Poppers
105 Ill. 491 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1882)
Slagel v. Murdock
65 Mo. 522 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Mo. 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-v-tabor-mo-1855.