Walter v. . Nova Realty Company

New York Court of Appeals

Walter v. . Nova Realty Company

107 N.E. 1029, 214 N.Y. 610, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1271

DecidedJanuary 26, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 107 N.E. 1029 (Walter v. . Nova Realty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walter v. . Nova Realty Company, 107 N.E. 1029, 214 N.Y. 610, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1271 (N.Y. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Hogan, J.

The appeal in the above-entitled action was argued with the appeal in Joseph Metzger, appellant, against the same defendants, and involved the questions determined in that action. For the reason stated in the opinion in the case of Metzger against the same defendants (214 N. Y. 26) the judgment of the Appellate Division in this case should be affirmed, with costs.

Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Miller and Cardozo, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hogan, J.

The appeal in the above-entitled action was argued with the appeal in Joseph Metzger, appellant, against the same defendants, and involved the questions determined in that action. For the reason stated in the opinion in the case of Metzger against the same defendants (214 N. Y. 26) the judgment of the Appellate Division in this case should be affirmed, with costs.

Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Miller and Cardozo, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 N.E. 1029, 214 N.Y. 610, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-v-nova-realty-company-ny-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack