Walter v. Laurino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Walter v. Laurino

263 A.D. 874, 32 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7159

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 5, 1942·Published

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the separate defense is that the appellant’s co-owner of the fee, and the mortgagee, conspired to foreclose the mortgage for the purpose of wiping out the appellant’s interest. Order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the separate defense is that the appellant’s co-owner of the fee, and the mortgagee, conspired to foreclose the mortgage for the purpose of wiping out the appellant’s interest. Order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Walter v. Laurino, 263 A.D. 874, 32 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

263 A.D. 874 (Walter v. Laurino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.