Walter v. Laurino
This text of 263 A.D. 874 (Walter v. Laurino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the separate defense is that the appellant’s co-owner of the fee, and the mortgagee, conspired to foreclose the mortgage for the purpose of wiping out the appellant’s interest. Order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 A.D. 874, 32 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-v-laurino-nyappdiv-1942.